Council & Democracy
- Council and Democracy Overview
- Your Council
- Census 2011 information
- Community Right to Bid
- Constitution of the Council
- Consultations
- Council Agendas, Minutes and Reports
- Elections
- Equalities & Diversity
- Essex Local Authorities
- Financial Information
- Freedom of Information
- Our Performance
- Overview & Scrutiny
- Partnerships
- Petitions
- Policies, Plans and Strategies
- Ageing Population Strategy
- Asset Management Plan
- Climate Change and Sustainability Strategy 2008 - 2013
- Capital Strategy
- Consultation Strategy
- Contaminated Land Strategy
- Corporate Debt Policy and Guidelines
- Corporate Plan
- Corporate Risk Framework and Policy
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Customer Charter
- Data Protection Policy
- Data Quality and Records Management Policy
- Economic Development Strategy
- Environmental Policy
- Essex Trust Charter
- Key Decisions Document
- Homelessness Strategy
- Housing Renewal Assistance Policy
- Housing Strategy 2008 - 2011
- ICT Strategy 2007-2011
- Member Development Policy
- Partnership Guidance
- Performance Management
- Planning Policy
- Allocations Scheme for Social Housing
- Private Sector Housing Strategy
- Procurement Strategy
- Record Disposal Guidelines
- Revenues and Benefits Policy
- Single Equality Scheme 2009 - 20012
- Social Compact
- Sustainable Community Strategy 2010 - 2015
- Vision to Reality
- Workforce Development Plan
- Rochford District Profile
- Senior Management Team
- Standards at Rochford
- What is Council and Democracy?
You are here
Contaminated Land Strategy
Tue, 13/05/2008 - 12:00am -- Immediacy
The Government believes contaminated land to be "an archetypal example of our failure in the past to move towards sustainable development". The first priority has therefore been specified as the prevention of new contamination via the pollution control regimes.
Secondly there are three stated objectives underlying the suitable for use approach as follows:
- to identify and remove unacceptable risks to human health and the environment;
- to seek to bring damaged land back into beneficial use;
- and to seek to ensure that the cost burdens faced by individuals, companies and society as a whole are proportionate, manageable and economically sustainable.
The suitable for use approach recognises that risk can only be satisfactorily assessed in the context of a specific use with the aim of maintaining an acceptable level of risk at minimum cost, thereby, "not disturbing social, economic and environmental priorities".
Related Documents
Further information on dealing with
contaminated land (PDF 910kb).







